2 Comments
User's avatar
David Perlmutter's avatar

The opt-in thing will at least mean that the schools and libraries who would be targeted by the book banners for having them in their collections could avoid the controversy. But it would mean the kids who would be the target audience would miss out on some valuable reading experiences...

Expand full comment
Kern Carter's avatar

Yeah, it's really a lose/lose, IMO. The book bans means librarians and teachers are now responsible for deciphering what is "allowed" and the penalties, in some cases, are pretty severe. Scholastic is trying to be proactive, but in doing so, they're literally marginalizing already marginalized groups and accepting a bias level of censorship.

Expand full comment